this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
44 points (86.7% liked)

PCGaming

6500 readers
1 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is there a good reason for people who have played the sequel to then play the original? I've only played RDR for a dozen or so hours. I liked that the NPCs weren't hyper-aggro like many are in RDR2, and the UI was less annoying, but the world and gameplay felt kind of lackluster and repetitive. Maybe getting the earlier part of the story makes it worthwhile?

[–] Isbjerg@feddit.dk 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

RDR2 is actually a prequel to RDR, if that helps you in your decision making.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Also the first game is way more arcade-y than the immersive sim of the second.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe they'll release the zombies expansion...