Programmer Humor

32483 readers

679 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

203

js Monk and Fly (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I can't test it right now but I would love to know. Is it true?

[–] burrito82@feddit.de 39 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Seems to be so, see Exceptional behavior of document.all

Although document.all is also falsy and loosely equal to undefined, it is not undefined. The case of document.all having type "undefined" is classified in the web standards as a "willful violation" of the original ECMAScript standard for web compatibility.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, it's undefined

[–] lseif@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

not strictly

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

typeof x === "undefined" is true.

Then the bastard tries to willingly access x to equate it to undefined, but that can't work since x is undefined and yields a ReferenceError (rendering the third expression moot).

The monks answers of document.all is not applicable since document.all is a live set of data which can be nothing or everything.

Who even introduced document.all? I bet it was microsoft...