this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
251 points (98.8% liked)

Games

32976 readers
1440 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] simple@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually not really. It's not sharing any of Nintendo's assets so there isn't any ground for it to be removed.

[–] Owljfien@lemm.ee 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Since when has not having grounds stopped corporations from trying? Case in point, YouTube copyright striking

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They're much more likely to spend time on the easy wins than on anything that'll take time and money to fight in court. Since these folks aren't redistributing any of Nintendo's copyrighted content, it's not as simple of a takedown as an emulator that includes private keys.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Github isn't taking Nintendo to court over one of their users projects. They just comply with the takedown request and remove it. The user/dev isn't going to fight Nintendo to bring it back either.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

what emulator includes private keys? because it's not yuzu