110
submitted 4 months ago by federalreverse@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 38 points 4 months ago

The Debian maintainer is probably a volunteer. Can we not troll people who make Debian and Foss possible?

[-] chameleon@kbin.social 26 points 4 months ago

The KeePassXC people are also volunteers and dealing with the fallout of this decision.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago

True, but let them settle it without turning a few thousand people against one person.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago

well it is that one person causing issues

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 4 months ago

If by issues you mean looking out for people's privacy sure, someone has to.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 months ago

by issues I mean breaking existing users' workflow, possibly literally locking them out (I personally use a yubikey with my keepass db, for example).

There is a very simple solution he could have done: not rename the existing package. Just give his fork a new name. That's it, everybody is happy.

So yes, he is the one causing issues. Because the issue isn't in the features he removed, but by breaking the users'expectation that the package they installed yesterday, is the same one they're updating today.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To be fair, it looks like the debian maintainer started the unfriendly discourse by calling the work of other FOSS devs "crap"

Everyone needs to chill out, otherwise we have another potential XZ social engineering attack

It would be catastrophic for something like keepass to have a malicious maintainer take over

[-] federalreverse@feddit.de 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You have a point to some degree, yet I still think it is defensible to make this post. He majorly altered software

  • downstream
  • against user expectations
  • for somewhat spurious reasons
  • seemingly quite ad-hoc

He then went on to defend that decision in a less-than-graceful way before announcing there will be a second, new package.

But, to make it clear: I certainly don't approve of hate directed toward him and I don't have a personal issue with him.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 4 months ago

He is paid by Canonical.

Explains some of the hubris.

this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
110 points (77.2% liked)

Linux

47523 readers
1441 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS