Privacy

31991 readers

623 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

184

Telegram apparently censor queer groups (mastodon.social)

submitted 6 months ago by DaseinPickle@leminal.space to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://leminal.space/post/6433881

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Whenever a user adds a new client (device), all conversations recipients should have to approve in order for them to see the chat history.

Why though? In case of a public chat or a chat with at least few dozens of users it'll already be excessive if it could work at all.

All chat history and groups are peer 2 peer

Like really P2P or E2E? Because I know at least one chat app that is serverless but doesn't involve E2E apparently - tox. E2E is an overkill for big group chats because it means you have to re-encrypt every message for every new user for them to see it. Else if you rely on just a fixed shared key it's not E2E anymore (which will make some people sad and hate your app).

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why though? In case of a public chat or a chat with at least few dozens of users it'll already be excessive if it could work at all.

For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups.

Like really P2P or E2E?

Yep real P2P. The design is inspired by BitTorrent.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

For public chats, you wouldn't need to approve, only for private chat groups.

I get that but it kind of defeats the purpose. If your group is so small that it's worth it for every member to approve new ones then it probably doesn't produce enough content for each new member to care about.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 4 points 6 months ago

See, we're already the Messenger Working Group 😂