this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
907 points (98.4% liked)

xkcd

8836 readers
105 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://xkcd.com/2929

Alt text:

While it seemed like a fun prank at the time, I realize my prank fire extinguishers full of leaded gasoline were a mistake.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It would probably work just fine, but it needs a huge ship. It could get up to a few percent of the speed of light.

FWIW, nuclear test ban treaties are considered to outlaw it. I think we're more likely to solve the technical difficulties of antimatter propulsion than we are to get over the political difficulties of nuclear bomb propulsion.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It could get up to a few percent of the speed of light.

So could a person sticking their head out and blowing, but it's still a terrible idea.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Just as an observation, there was a time when everyone on the Internet was gaga over the idea of Project Orion, and you didn't dare speak out against it lest you get a hail of downvotes.

It'd work fine in deep space. It's not a good idea to launch from Earth this way. But again, we'll probably find something better once we're at the stage of needing it.

[–] szczuroarturo@programming.dev -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But then how would you launch nukes on orbit without the risk of accudental nuclear explosion?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 6 months ago

Implosion-type nukes are all but impossible to make go off that way. They need a whole bunch of small explosives to go off very precisely to squeeze the core in just the right way. A short circuit or a crash won't have the necessary precision. This isn't entirely safe, either--it can still cause a small explosion with a flash of fallout and radiation--but it's a manageable problem.

Gun-types (Little Boy was one) are easier to go off on accident, but the US retired its last gun-type design decades ago. I don't think Russia used them much, either. They're only good for smaller bombs, and their safety issues make them questionable for any use. Smaller nuclear powers aren't bothering with them.