this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
247 points (93.6% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
264 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title is editorialized because the original is, frankly, clickbait garbage

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 125 points 6 months ago (11 children)

I am pretty over these videos of people whining about the amount of data big tech collects while refusing to move to alternatives because "muh convenience".

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 75 points 6 months ago (9 children)

For those unaware, Organic Maps (uses OSM) is really good! It's good for 90% of all ur navigation needs. For the rest 10%, there's no good alternative to google maps unfortunately.

[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

My issue with these is that my use case is public transport, for that it seems like GMaps is still unbeatable, i hope to find an alternative as good or better based on OSM soon because it's the one tool i still have no alternative to

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

Where are you from? Where I live (in the Netherlands) there's an official tool from the public transport services which works just as well as gmaps to plan your train/tram/metro/bus journey.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 3 points 6 months ago

If you're American, some of them support transit now. I have Magic Earth and it supports it in most major metro areas (and even my dinky little city I believe lol)

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Same same. This is a problem in shithole cities. Good cities have their own transit apps (which are like Uber for public transit).

[–] Unreliable@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, any examples? I know for NYC people use Citymapper, but that's available for most big cities.

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Calgary, Hong Kong, Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, etc.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I think 5 out of that 10% is supplemented by OsmAnd. But it does not have public transport schedules and traffic data.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

There are often individual apps for various cities and transport organizations.

Traffic has always been a mixed bag. Yeah it's nice to be able to see that street A is more busy than street B. But so can everybody else, and they're all going to use street B now.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Meh, I find most people don't even bother.

I use secondary routes 90% of the time by default, because they're just as fast with less mental effort and less risk.

Why go with all the lemmings?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But so can everybody else, and they're all going to use street B now.

In my experience that's not how it works out. It's about balancing the load, while making the driver take the least amount of detour needed.
Street B only has to handle the remaining traffic, and street A has a chance to unclog or at least be a faster route as some of its traffic does not exist anymore.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The app doesn't control what people do, it just makes recommendations based on busy segments, based on data which is already obsolete by the time it's being used. Ultimately the lemmings will do whatever their lemming brain tells them to.

(That is, assuming the app doesn't actually try to spread people around the various routes. But I doubt that any app maker wants to assume responsibility for that.)

Ultimately traffic apps are mostly useless. You can't "solve" traffic congestion with apps any more than you can make water flow faster through a pipe. Congestion is constrained by available road space and choke points. Google Maps is mostly an excuse for Google to collect location data, with a thin layer of features on top to make it seem worthwhile.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Water does not think, it flows where it can.
People while driving cannot know which route isn't clogged, because cars are not flowing like water. If that would be the case all the small streets around main roads would be full too. If a street is clogged, and the driver sees it, they can decide to go on a different route, but in waze if they are using it to plan a route, it'll try actively to avoid roads that are too busy.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

If that would be the case all the small streets around main roads would be full too.

They are. If they aren't then your city is not really that busy. It's actually a major problem in some cities for the residents of small residential streets that suddenly start getting lots of traffic because their street gets recommended on Waze or Maps.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Wow, organic maps is really nice, seems like a much cleaner user interface than OsmAnd, whereas OsmAnd has more options.

[–] Niiru@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Reviews most definitely. Hard to beat that

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'm glad I came back to this thread. Would never have heard of this!

[–] delirious_owl 1 points 6 months ago

Can you search for street addresses?

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't understand how anyone can believe this, I keep trying it over and over and over and it fails on the absolute most basic of business searches. And some of the directions it gives are just completely nonsensical, and it's voice guidance is absolutely terrible making it fairly easy to miss a Direction if you're not able to be looking at the screen

I hate giving my location to Google but at the end of the day they are still the only GPS navigation that doesn't suck at basic navigation

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do u live in some place less humans live? Like a village or something? OSM is mapped by volunteers, which means that less OSM enthusiasts around you = worse mapping. Perhaps you could start a little bit of mapping?

As for the voice navigation, well Organic doesn't have its own voice. It uses ur phone's native text to speech engine. If u have completely degoogled ur phone, then u probably would be using some other tts engine (which most probably sucks ass).

As for the searches, yeah, they need a better local search engine.

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I don't just mean the voice, even just HOW it gives directions. Google maps gives you multiple warnings for a turn , one way before, one approaching, one right at. It also will often tell you which lane to take a turn in if multiple exist (use the second from the left lane to turn left) if your next turn is right after with little warning.

It's been a hot minute so i can try again to see if it's changed but directions were terrible with little extra warning and no taking the next direction into account.

The map was also just... Messy, little outlines for buildings everywhere a bunch of random green squares all over the map that I couldn't figure out how to turn off and wasn't even sure what they were meant to represent other than they seemed to roughly correspond with grassy or treed areas but for using it as a navigation app that is extremely annoying because it just makes the whole map of cluttered mess and makes it difficult to really tell what I'm looking at when I'm trying to drive and need to see my next Direction quickly and easily at a glance

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago

also a lot of open maps alternatives rely on YOUR contribution to be good instead of a hired team at some corpo.

use it and help out with it and you will have your open mapping app!

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well change can only be done through voicing disapproval first, although Google will most definitely won't stop the data gathering in Maps.

Well It's understandable if a lot of people wouldn't switch over to OSM-based apps. I've tried OSMAnd, and I observe 3 drawbacks. Lengthy public transport calculation (fair since it's computing on the phone), no reviews in POI areas (really hard to catch up on), weird results in transportations

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well change can only be done through voicing disapproval first

Yes, but if you as the consumer never actually stop giving the company your money and/or data then there is little incentive for them to change. Just complaining by itself does absolutely nothing to a company the size of Google. You need to actually follow it up by using your limited power as a consumer to support an alternative. Only then, and if enough people do the same, will the first company consider making changes. If they don't, at least you are supporting an alternative project and helping it to improve so that it may one day feel like less of compromise.

[–] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

Absolutely agreed.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago

Most people (public and private) never go beyond disapproval, though.

You'll hear people complain about this and that, but never even looking for an alternative.

[–] Templa@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I always try to keep in mind there are a lot of people that are simply unable to transition to alternative apps because they lack knowledge and time to do research on such things. What we see through videos isn't the majority of the people, it is people that make content for the majority.

People have hard times getting into more technical stuff already. Expecting people that are struggling to survive in capitalism to spend their free time learning about underground alternatives or to turn into sys admins and host their own stuff is out of touch if reality in my opinion.

Edit: just wanted to add, I wouldn't say the problem is on the people, but on big tech that predates on them

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Those people aren't complaining. The guy in the video specifically mentioned Open Street Maps as an alternative, but only in the context of "well maybe one day Google will go in this direction". He has zero interest in actually switching and ends up making a bunch or excuses justifying his Google Maps usage. He is not trying to be part of a solution here, he is just whining.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Which GoogleMaps alternative has user reviews? I downloaded organic maps suggested here and there are no reviews. When I'm in a new town I need to know where I can and where I shouldn't eat, shop or stay. At least there are some icons on organic maps, but that's it.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The "user" reviews on Google Maps (and similar platforms like Yelp) can be fake. Go to the Fake Review Watch channel on YouTube or visit their website if you want to see real examples of this. This is a service that businesses of all sizes, all over the world are paying for - sometimes on a massive scale.

However if you still really want to rely on Google reviews, use GMaps WV.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)