this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
38 points (93.2% liked)

Programming

17416 readers
50 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
38
React, Electron, and LLMs have a common purpose: the labour arbitrage theory of dev tool popularity (www.baldurbjarnason.com)
submitted 6 months ago by rimu@piefed.social to c/programming@programming.dev
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The evolution of software development over the past decade has been very frustrating. Little of it seems to makes sense, even to those of us who are right in the middle of it. My theory is fairly straightforward:

The long-term popularity of any given tool for software development is proportional to how much labour arbitrage it enables.

The more effective it is at enabling labour arbitrage, the more funding and adoption it gets from management.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] duhdugg@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

The components sourced from an intern fixing ChatGPT’s output just enough for it to run and the exhaustively tested ones from a senior developer are equivalent in the eyes of management.

Um. What? This is not normal. Seek better management.