9
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Except the first assumption that e^x = its own integral, everything else actually makes sense (except the DX are in the wrong powers). You simply treat the "1" and "integral dx" as operators, formally functions from R^R into R^R and "(0)" as calculating the value of the operator on a constant-valued function 0. EDIT: the step 1/(1-integral) = the limit of a certain series is slightly dubious, but I believe it can be formally proven as well. EDIT 2: I was proven wrong, read the comments

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's the thing about physicists doing math. They know the universe already works. So if they break some math on the way to an explanation, so what? You can fix math. They care about the universe. It's pretty cool sometimes. Like bra-ket notation is really an expression the linear algebra concepts of dual space and adjoints. But to a physicist, it's just how the math should work if it is to do anything useful.

So yeah, this post looks like nonsense. Because it is. But there is a lesson that "math" should work like this, and there is utility in pushing the limits. No pun intended.

Edit: I'm not claiming this is a useful application. It's circular reasoning as this post's parent alludes to.

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Math Memes

1156 readers
1 users here now

Memes related to mathematics.

Rules:
1: Memes must be related to mathematics in some way.
2: No bigotry of any kind.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS