this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024

107 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers

57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

107

Gee, what could go wrong with a ~50,000 pound vehicle that's potentially an automated death machine? (hexbear.net)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/self-driving-tractor-trailers-us-roads-aurora/

https://archive.ph/SGbTF

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Self driving trucks but they have to be escorted by someone in a car, but that's cheaper because they don't have to have a CDL, and you innovate by connecting multiple trailers onto the truck in a row so you basically have Uber drivers piloting Australian road trains.

[–] context@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago

the car is also self-driving, there's only one person in the car and they're expected to take over the self-driving car and the self-driving truck if needed because hey, what are the odds that both self-driving features will fail at the same time?