this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
704 points (96.7% liked)

Political Memes

5434 readers
3385 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bipta@kbin.social 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

His lawyer argued presidents can assassinate their political opponents at the Supreme Court today, and as if that's not bad enough, they seem receptive to it.

These are dark fucking times.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Buddo, if you think crackhead lawyers arguing "The president ordering political assassinations is OK" is gonna fly and be the law of the land, I have a bridge to sell you!

Or, if youre right, Dark Brandon is about to be reeeeeeaaaaal busy.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

I admire your confidence while wondering where the hell you got it.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

I mean, I heard the same attitude in 2016.

These things are unthinkable until they happen.

Biden doesn't have the balls to so much as J walk with presidential immunity.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are a very foolish person; the type who brings about the end times.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ping me again when they rule and lmk if they OK assassinating political rivals, thanks

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 6 months ago

A lawyer has a duty to attempt the most favorable outcome for their client, even if the methodology is insane. So long as it can be squeezed into some sort of logical interpretation of the law, or to argue the law is improper. It doesn't mean they actually believe their own bullshit necessarily.