this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
71 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
359 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The national security angle is a farce because ByteDance was already forced to move their service to the US on an American-owned hosting provider, and they have already put people with a history of aligning with “American interests” into executive positions, like CEO Shou Zi Chew and vice president Michael Beckerman, and American oligarchs are invested in it. I think the US “intelligence community” already has everything it needs to monitor and control TikTok.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I never understood what it would help to have the data on a US server. It's not that difficult to access it there from China. I access my server in Germany via SSH from Korea.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

Because American hosting providers like Oracle are constituent parts of the military-intelligence-industrial complex, as are American ISPs.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What can ByteDance access that China couldn't just buy from Alphabet or Meta or some other tech company?

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Uh huh, and do you think Alphabet and Meta don't do that? Do you think if China offered to buy that data they wouldn't be able to get it? Grow up.

My point is that we should be taking internet privacy seriously, not just going after foreign companies.

It's not okay when the spies are American. Until I see serious action taken against the worst offenders I'll know this is all theater.

[–] Sgn@programming.dev -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

China can't buy data from US companies. That's illegal. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

Not yet. There was an executive order to ban selling data to "enemies" that would include China but it hasn't been implemented.

Also I'm highly skeptical it'll work. China can just work through proxies and not buy directly.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like the US would ban selling vital data to big enemies, and getting info from ByteDance is free.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The US doesn't ban selling data, though. China can buy whatever it wants just as easily as harvesting it from ByteDance.

And I'd hardly call running an entire social media enterprise "free". If it's a torjan horse, it's an entirely unnecessary one.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Internet coverage of that topic is surprisingly limited for what seems to be an easily-thought-of national security risk...

ByteDance's capitalist entrepreneurs run the enterprise for them, and they can extort data out, yes, for free.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Running a company isn't free lol

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Again, China does not run the company, they just own the leash on the private entrepreneurs who do. That's one of Deng's benefits for implementing capitalism. (mildlyinteresting: the word capitalism isn't capitalized)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

China has a massive stake in the company. It's a huge investment for them. Hardly "free"

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's a one-time fee that also earns money back compared to the continuous payments to buy from other sources.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Assuming China doesn't have to spend literally any other money, even though countries are constantly investing in infrastructure and security and material to assist the business.

But also, literally not free. My point stands.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You won't just stop the maintenance if TikTok didn't exist. It's not like all China cares about is data.

Your question was "why would China get data from TikTok when they can just buy it from Meta". If China didn't get the data from ByteDance, ByteDance still incurs the maintenance fee. So no, that is not the expense of getting the data.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

After a ton of alternating search queries, apparently both of these avenues are being used, and Biden announced working on such a ban in late February.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The executive order is specifically targeting data brokerage, a practice that is shockingly unregulated. There is no federal law that oversees the collection of and sale of the most intimate details of our lives. And when data is sold to countries of concern, it can become a national security issue.

It's good the bare minimum is being implemented.... though it's weird how two months have passed without updates.

I must point out that this only concerns data being sold to Russia or China, ie, it's just security theater. I would like to see some restrictions on data being sold to anyone, including so-called US allies. Israel, in particular, collects data on American Palestinians who contact family back in Palestine and uses this to feed its AI that generates kill lists.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 6 months ago

"but job loss!1!"