this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
62 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
667 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
62
A.I. experts downplay ‘nightmare scenario of evil robot overlords’. Over 1,300 sign letter claiming it’s a ‘force for good, not a threat to humanity’ (fortune.com)
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@beehaw.org
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In an open letter published on Tuesday, more than 1,370 signatories—including business founders, CEOs and academics from various institutions including the University of Oxford—said they wanted to “counter ‘A.I. doom.’”

“A.I. is not an existential threat to humanity; it will be a transformative force for good if we get critical decisions about its development and use right,” they insisted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now that the AI's quality is rapidly degrading, I'm significantly less worried about glorified auto-correct taking over the planet.

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop, how exactly are they getting worse?

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT'S math response quality has declined (at least in certain areas).

I am by no means an AI expert, but I would imagine this decrease in quality coming from one of three things:

  1. Super fast development increasing ChatGPT's dataset, but decreasing its reliability.
  2. ChatGPT is far more censored than it was before, and this could have hurt the system's reliability.
  3. Maybe large-scale, mature large language models just dont scale well when exposed to certain kinds of inputs.

If the answer is one of the first two, I would expect and uncensored, open source LLM to overtake ChatGPT in the future.