this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
316 points (97.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

5998 readers
3 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 1 year ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Very blurry for a powerful telescope. Wonder if it’s because moon is moving fast relative to close telescope so the effective shutter speed needs to be relatively high?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Have we ruled out that the moon might just look like that? Like all fuzzy? How 'bout it, NASA?

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Titanically baked, blaze new world

[–] lefty7283@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

JWST primarily looks at very large objects that are far away. Titan (and really everything in the solar system) is relatively close to us, but are tiny in comparison to galaxies/nebulae, so their actual size as they appear in the sky is a lot smaller.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also of note, most objects in the outer solar system are very dim.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Can't really claim we're all that bright in the inner solar system either.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Must've left his glasses back on Earth

[–] clif@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Subtle dig at Hubble, I like it

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

I would assume it's because the object is too close. Like trying to do macro photography without a macro lense.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's just mipmaps, high res texture is still loading.