112

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14604927

Conservatives Quickly Turn Against “Idiot” Marjorie Taylor Greene

The Georgia Republican is fast falling out of favor for her opposition to the Ukraine aid bill.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene’s failed fight to end aid to Ukraine, and her sort-of-serious crusade against House Speaker Mike Johnson, has cost her the support of right-wing media.

The Sunday front page of the New York Post, owned by the conservative Murdoch family, was the latest outlet to attack Greene, invoking the “Moscow Marjorie” nickname coined by former representative Ken Buck.

Fox News, another arm of the Murdoch media empire, had already taken aim at the Georgia Republican last week, with columnist Liz Peek calling her an “idiot” and saying she needs to “turn all that bombastic self-serving showmanship and drama queen energy on Democrats.” This follows an editorial last month from The Wall Street Journal, also in the Murdoch portfolio, that called Greene “Rep. Mayhem Taylor Greene” and accused her and her allies of being “most interested in TV hits and internet donors.” 

Even a non-Murdoch outlet is on the attack, as conservative Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist Debra Saunders demanded to know “who put Marjorie Taylor Greene in charge?”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Then you should know we are giving Ukraine very formidable weapons. I get tired of people downplaying the quality of weapons we are sending. We are sending some solid weapons to Ukraine. It’s not old obsolete equipment. It’s the same equipment we use.

And law? That would date you. I never saw a law only the at-4

[-] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 5 months ago

I'm not downplaying what we're giving Ukraine; I was taking objection to the idea that the US barely has enough munitions to defend itself from a nebulous enemy and we need to be careful about how much we give out.

Yup, my service was decades ago.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

https://www.voanews.com/amp/without-more-funds-us-unable-to-hit-ammunition-production-goals/7510881.html

Right now we are making 28k a month. Ukraine shoots 7k a day. That’s 210,000 a month.

That’s the issue. It’s one I didn’t know we had. I always assumed we could ramp up quickly since that’s a standard round.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

It's the "without more funds" part that's misdirection. I still do assume that we could ramp up, quite quickly. These are private companies producing the munitions; if the gvmnt suddenly doubled the contract funding, I would be greatly surprised if we discovered production couldn't keep up.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Most the plants are not privately owned. They are government owned and contractors work in them.

Most of these plants were shutdown as a cost savings measure. That’s been the issue

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

https://thegunzone.com/who-manufactures-ammunition-for-the-us-military/

https://www.gd-ots.com/munitions/artillery/

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/naval-launchers-and-munitions.html (just to include one of the other branches)

I could find more, if you like. All claim to be the manufacturers of ordinance. It's not just the ammunition, the guns themselves are manufactured by private corporations. The M777 Howitzer is produced by BAE Systems. It's always a private contractor who designs and delivers weapons and ordinance.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Yes the guns are but that isn’t where we have the shortage. The shortage is the ammunition. A gun isn’t useful without ammo.

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/business/2023/10/17/middletown-iowa-ammunition-plant-will-make-more-of-the-artillery-shells-ukraine-is-firing-at-russia/71134562007/

There is another in Pennsylvania. Both are owned by the army and contractors make the ammo.

Same with lake city but they make rifle rounds.

If you can find where private companies are making 155mm in their own facilities I’d like to see it. I’ve only found it made in army arsenals.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

OK, let's ignore small arms and focus on things a civilian simply can't buy, like howitzers and tanks.

The actual munitions - not the weapons, but the ammunition - are manufactured by a variety of companies, including Aerojet Rocketdyne and Nammo. Nammo makes a bunch of ammunition, from small arms, to cannon ammo for the M1 to 155mm Archer L52 howitzers. AR also produces ammunition for the A10's GAU, and a bunch of other munitions and munition parts for more complex munitions (missiles & bombs). Both of these companies make TOW missiles - again, the munitions, not the weapon systems.

Lockheed Martin makes the actual Patriot missiles - that article incidentally talking about the very ramping-up we're discussing.

The US outsources all weapons and ammo manufacture to the private sector. This is exactly why it's called the Military Industrial Complex, and why Eisenhower warned against it.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Those are the contractors. The government owns the facilities at least for 155mm. Can you show which factory makes the 155mm round? You seem to be confusing the contractor with the factory. Two two are not the same.

Missiles may be done differently; I have not found an article talking in detail about who owns what with the production of The Patriot.

As I cited previously, we are ramping up, but not quickly enough to meet their needs. Ukraine needs about 210,000 155mm rounds a month. We are generating about 28K a month.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

That goes against all the news article. We can’t keep up with the demand from Ukraine unless we deplete our stockpiles. If China acted up, Iran or if we needed to fight Russia we wouldn’t have the supply to do it.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
112 points (85.9% liked)

Conservative

363 readers
21 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS