this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
888 points (98.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21190 readers
916 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    888
    systemdeez nuts (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 6 months ago by silverchase@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    206 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 60 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    My understanding is that some people are die hards to the software philosophy of "do one thing really well". systemd at the very least does many different things. These people would prefer to chain a bunch of smaller programs together to replicate the same functionality of systemd since every program in the chain fits the philosophy of "does one thing really well".

    [–] ramble81@lemm.ee 47 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    For me it’s 3 things

    • Do one thing and do it well
    • Everything is a file in Linux
    • human readable logs

    Systemd breaks all three of though by being monolithic and binary. It actually makes you have to jump through more hoops to do things in certain cases. I understand it’s a mindset shift but it really starts making it feel more like Windows with how it works and the registry and event log.

    [–] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

    I don't see how systemd has anything like the Windows registry. At least its journals are leagues ahead of Windows event logs, I hate those things and the awful viewer they have.

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

    like Windows

    systemd-bsod is incoming

    [–] suzune@ani.social 3 points 6 months ago

    You forgot: use as many dependencies as you need. For example, my init system does not use xz-utils.