this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
807 points (89.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21190 readers
886 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Titou@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The terminal is not an accessory like on Windows, it's apart of the daily Linux experience

    [–] jagungal@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It shouldn't be though. A command line interface is not user friendly for entry-level users, and until Linux UX designers realise this, Linux will never gain a greater market share. And we have seen this with Ubuntu, Mint, and other "user friendly" distros gaining popularity. I'm not saying that we should necessarily aim for broad-scale adoption of Linux as an end in itself, but more users means more support for Linux which means a better experience for all.

    [–] Titou@feddit.de -3 points 6 months ago

    Linux was never meant to be "user-friendly", Windows and Linux are 2 differents things, but i know this fact is hard to accept tho.

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    If Linux wants to ever have adoption outside tech people then it can't be. If a normide has to open up a terminal then that's already one less Linux user.

    I have used Linux for my main PC for a very long time but I have also worked in tech support and your average user will never ever use an OS where using the terminal is mandatory.

    I my opinion there should be some hobbyist distros where the terminal is your daily experience like Arch or Gentoo but the main focus should be accessibility for the average user if adoptability is a goal.

    [–] Titou@feddit.de -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    If you don't like using the Terminal use Mint, but even this one require some basics terminal skills that everybody could learn fast. Linux is made this way.

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Oh, there are tons of distros where you don't need to use the terminal for anything, even Manjaro, an arch based distro, doesn't need you to ever open the terminal. I was just saying that if adoption is the goal then using the terminal can't be a requirement for a normal user experience.

    [–] Titou@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Wrong example, Manjaro is probably the less stables distro i've tried, and thoses issues seems to be common when you look at the forum

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    What I mean is that using the terminal isn't mandatory in Manjaro while Arch and Arch based distros all require it. So for that it's an excellent example.

    As for stability it's a bit more stable than Arch itself from my experience but I still has issues. The most stable distro I have used was Pop OS, I didn't have a single issue there for like 3 years straight, I only switched because of a hardware change and Pop OS's Mesa version was unstable on the new hardware.

    My central point is still that you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

    [–] Titou@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    you will never in a million years get the average computer user to use a terminal.

    We used to back in the 20th century, when computer didn't had GUI

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    No, we didn't. Average computer users didn't exist then, only tech people.

    [–] Titou@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Yep as you said not everybody is made to use a computer, but everybody can learn how to with a minimum of will

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Wait, so you think computer usage should go back to just large companies and a few niche enthusiasts?

    [–] Titou@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

    Im just saying everybody can learn basic terminal commands, because on Linux you're on your own

    [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

    Yes, they can but an average user never will and for Linux to get any adoption beyond the enthusiast space it also can't be a requirement.

    Like it's fine if you believe Linux should never get mass adoption and be a niche desktop OS. All I'm saying is that I want Linux to get mass adoption and for that terminal usage can't be a requirement because your average computer user, who's most advanced computer use is installing an ad blocker on their browser, will never open a terminal.

    [–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

    If more casual PC users got on to it, i wouldn't call it a daily experience. Yeah you need to use it some times but once everyone is set, you dont really need to mess with it

    I switched to Mint a few months ago and to be fair I have only messed with it a couple of times mainly just after the initial installation