this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
769 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
673 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 59 points 7 months ago (8 children)

You’ve heard good things about arch solely because you’re on Lemmy. Using arch means you’ll be dedicating about 50% of your working time towards tinkering and making it fucking work, which is fun don’t get me wrong- unless you have actual work to do.

Ubuntu is solid but a little sluggish, I’m personally an advocate for Mint as far as something you can drop a windows users in and they’ll generally figure it out.

[–] notnotmike@programming.dev 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Seems like the general consensus in this section is Mint, so I'll give that a look over for sure

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Mint is a good recommendation. I've used it for most of a decade because I just want my system to work.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 7 months ago

I main Mint. Less annoying Ubuntu. Better user experience IMHO.

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don’t get this. For each of my devices running arch, the only tinkering I’ve encountered were for nitpicky customizations I wanted, which I have to do on another distro. After the arch installation completes it’s given me a fully functional desktop

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if you don't install the wrong packages or skip a step in the installation lmao

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

🤦‍♂️ of course! I forgot to install it wrong lol

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Your opinion about Arch is outdated at best. I run Arch, and I don't think I needed to do any tinkering in the last few months. For first time Arch users, I'll recommend them to just use EndeavourOS. I have it on my laptop, and it's basically Arch, but with a hassle free installation process.

[–] Mazoku@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Same for me, installed arch with archinstall, it installed faster than windows does, and I haven’t had to modify anything or tinker with anything. Even Steam games work out of the box with compatibility mode

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

50%?? Been daily driving for over a year and system maintenance is nowhere near the levels it's hyped up to be. Every once in a while the update requires manual intervention which can be solved by reading the email arch sends out before any of these atypical situations (register to be on the mailing list). Other system set up tinkering is well documented in the arch wiki.

Anyone interested in playing games on Linux should be exploring a rolling release distro even if for nothing more than access to updated GPU drivers as soon as they come out.

Don't forget the utiltiy of the AUR.

[–] GFGJewbacca@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

EndeavorOS might also be a good option, from what I've heard. It's Arch based, but easier to install and use. I recently switched to Garuda, also Arch based, but focused more on the gaming community.

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Manjaro is an okay middle ground. It’s got the benefits of Arch but a bit more stability. It still breaks, but maybe once a year. I get work done on it.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Manjaro fell out of popularity a few years ago -- in addition to some drama with the handling of community donations, they do some weird stuff like hold back all Arch package updates by 2 weeks for "additional stability"... But really it's just an extra 2 weeks where you don't get potentially critical security updates. I also think the way they handle the AUR is reckless and leads new users to install unstable or poorly maintained packages without realizing it

It's still a viable distro, but generally I think Garuda beats it in every category: still based on Arch with a focus on gaming, but without the useless delay or the other issues that Manjaro has.

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The AUR was disabled by default on my install. I use flatpak for a lot of stuff so I’m probably pretty up to date with my most used programs. Where did you hear about this community donation scandal?

All the petty downvotes makes me think Lemmy has become a bit too much like Reddit. The whole “downvote everyone’s opinion that isn’t my opinion” is pathetic.

I don’t really care about what’s popular. With all my installed programs I use to get shit done, I can’t distro hop every other month like some people.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Did you try googling Manjaro community donation scandal because it's pretty easy to find... Here's the first of many articles I found https://linuxreviews.org/Manjaro_Linux_Lead_Developer_In_Hot_Waters_Over_Donation_Slush_Fund_For_Laptop_And_Personal_Items

Garuda does everything Manjaro does but better.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

I don't really like mint's desktop environment

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago

That's a big exaggeration. Is Ubuntu a better choice for a newb? Yes. Do some people gravitate toward Arch because of the freedom in tinkering it offers? Also yes. But Arch has had simple graphical installers for years now, not to mention the wraparound distros like Endeavour that bundle extra software for a more complete OOTB setup. Arch is a viable choice for a new Linux user and really doesn't require tinkering for a working setup.