this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
492 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
4315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aleph@lemm.ee 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's clear that the M3 MacBooks are noticably slower with 8GB or RAM than with 16GB for various tasks, though, including photo & video editing, and 3D rendering.

Sure, 8GB gets the job done but why are Apple selling "professional" grade laptops in this price range that clearly require additional memory to reach peak performance?

[–] scorpious@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Point taken! Clearly more is always better. Don't have any experience with the M2 or 3.

I'm just adding a personal experience with having the minimum be plenty to get big jobs done.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I get more because I know I’ll need more. I don’t get less and then complain I should have gotten more even though I knew I couldn’t upgrade later.

Really, Apple just shouldn’t have said what they did and they wouldn’t be in hot water.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 7 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

videos showing how the M3 MacBooks struggle with 8GB of RAM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.