this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
795 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19589 readers
634 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
795
We'll refactor this next year anyways (programming.dev)
submitted 7 months ago by popcar2@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] swordsmanluke@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just saying.

.... Saying what, exactly?

I said that we should

  • design for change
  • "within reason"
  • because we can't know what exact changes are needed.

And you argued... The same thing? Just in the reverse order?

[โ€“] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Seems like he's worried you'll Java everything up, which can be valid.

I think a good, easy example is whether your application should allow a selection of databases or be tied to one database.

You can make arguments for either, often (but not always) regardless of your use case.