this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
302 points (96.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
4093 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit:

  • article title update, bump not bomb jolt'
  • added comma

DENVER — An engine cover on a Boeing 737 operated by Southwest Airlines ripped open just after taking off from Denver International Airport Sunday morning.

The Houston-bound Southwest flight took off from DIA around 7:45 a.m., and returned to the airport 30 minutes later, landing safely. No injuries were reported.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

No, it’s not. If I asked you to get on a plane that had a 1 in 3 chance of crashing, would you?

Statistically, you’d be fine. The absolute risk of a plane crash may be minimal. But if you are on a plane that is crashing, that is little consolation. That is what the commenter was pointing out. It is a valid presumption.

If you were on a crashing plane, would you be statistically fine?

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No of course not. Noone is arguing that the statistics will protect the you, only (effectively) that it's such a rare occurrence that you might as well just assume youll be fine.

Saying "well some people weren't fine!" Is a silly point. Noone is denying plane crashes occur.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Everybody who has ever died in a plane crash was also, statistically, going to be fine.

The comment you are disputing

Noone is arguing that the statistics will protect you.

It relays that way. The other commenters said they don’t understand statistics, and statistics don’t work that way.

Saying "well some people weren't fine!" Is a silly point.

Then why are you disputing the comment. There isn’t anything untrue or illogical in that comment. I’m genuinely scared that there are people in here that don’t understand that if you are in a crashing plane, you’re not worried about statistics. Frightening, actually.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The comment you are disputing

Incorrect. The comment I was responding to was about the down votes being "scary." I'm not disputing their claim, I said it was a dumb point. It's like challenging someone who says it's a waste of money to play the lotto by pointing to the fact that some people have won.

It's true that some people have won. But its still a bad point. We are talking about the ridiculously rare exception as if it's really worth considering.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Everyday there are thousands of Boeing flights that go off without a hitch. It's still statically completely unlikely that anything bad will happen to you on a Boeing flight. So much so that it's probably not even worth worrying about at all.

But this isn't to say that we should just let their bs slide. This is exactly why flying is so safe: we are sticklers for making sure they do everything right. If that's going in the opposite direction, we should nip it in the bud long before it gets anywhere close to the point where you should question the safety of it.

But, again, we aren't even remotely close to that now. It makes no logical sense to be afraid of flying right now, even on a Boeing jet. And I would like to keep it that way which is why I think their issues need to be addressed.

Like I said, frightening.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I don't follow. Even with Boeings current struggles, it's still ridiculously safe to fly. Saying "some people have died!" in response to someone pointing out this fact - in response to someone expressing concern about the safety of flying - doesn't make any sense, regardless of the fact that we agree it should be addressed.