this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

17482 readers
184 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MichelleG@lemmy.world
RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
thisisdee@lemmy.world
35
Why does Automator still exist, when Shortcuts could have replaced it entirely? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by DJDarren@thelemmy.club to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

First up, I realise that Automator does so much more than Shortcuts. But my question is: why?

I have a couple of spreadsheets that I want to be reminded of once a week so I can keep an eye on the dates they contain. My stupid ADHD brain is likely to forget to check them, and a reminder is only as useful as whether I'm able to act on it at that moment in time. So I've set up an automation to open them up at a specific time. Given that Shortcuts on macOS doesn't support automations (as far as I can tell), the only way to do this is;

  • Create a shortcut that will open the documents I need to open.

  • Create an automator application that uses a bash script to open the shortcut.

  • Create a calendar entry where the alert is set to open the automator app.

So I guess I want to know why Shortcuts (for macOS) can't run automations, why Calendar can't open Shortcuts, and why Shortcuts didn't subsume everything that Automator can do? Who at Apple thought it was perfectly right and proper to have to distinct and powerful apps essentially offering the same functions, but that neither of them fully encompass the abilities of the other?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It’s likely many users still use Automator (which is from 2005). Removing it could break workflows for many people if removed. There’s a bunch of older apps in macOS like this. The latest version of macOS still has AirPort Utility, for example.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Airport utility has a hidden wifi strength measuring tool, which is super useful!

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I use it often at work e.g. for developing a embedded Linux device that has a wifi dongle in the case.

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I just wish these features could be updated and integrated into the OS or new app instead all these vestigial apps hanging around.

Like bringing the airport utility’s functionality into the OS proper should be part of the OS updates.

But instead, the network section in system prefs somehow gets MORE obtuse over time while good functionality languishes in a forgotten app and major OS updates are now primarily new emojis for messages.