this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
551 points (76.0% liked)

Memes

45923 readers
1814 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I call it a balanced diet... Who the fuck is exclusivly eating meat?

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jordan Peterson? That is if the has a few moments inbetween crying on cam in his messy room.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No idea who that is, but I bet he has Gout.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why are you trying to cyber bully me, I'm 12.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Why are you trying to cyber bully me, I'm 12.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm not even arguing with you, you're just resorting to name calling, can you not see when someone isn't arguing with you?. Plus what makes you think im a guy

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"DiD yOu jUsT aSsuME mY gEndEr?!" Bloved madman asked, smirking to himself.

Yeah bro, because you would only pretent not to be to try to play a gotcha.

Let's call it an educated guess based on your lack of education.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha. OK, if it makes you feel better.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're a real pain in my ass, but that's my job. I educate morons on the internet.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it looks like you lost the argument we were having and then resort to name calling, that's immature. Please leave me alone.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your bad faith argument that trans people deserve harassment was more than immature, it was actively harmful to others. You ought to be asshamed of yourself. Your hate has consequences, namely that other people hate you for it.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You need to learn how to read. Nothing I have said even comes close to saying that trans people deserve harassment. and nothing I have said is hateful other than calling those that are bigots, and those that send unsolicited indecent images to unwilling recipients are deplorable (I may have also called them cunts). Nothing about this stance is transphobic, regardless of the identity of those involved…

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

You sound like a dumb pile of shit.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What do you want from me? Are you going to stalk me all over Lemmy?

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want you to learn. I want you to grow. I want you to stop being a hateful person and start contributing to society. I want you to begin by going outside and touching grass.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You need to learn how to read. Nothing I have said is hateful, other than calling those that are bigots, and those who send unsolicited indecent images to unwilling recipients are deplorable (I may have also called them cunts). Nothing about this stance is transphobic, regardless of the identity of those involved.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know how to read. I was just showing you the effect of bad faith arguments. You didn't say those things, they were implied and I acted in bad faith to piss you off. Just the same as you did to start the while shitshow when you actually just implied that trans people should just accept the harassment with no retaliation. Like some kind of damned liberal or centrist.

So, maybe stop being such a cunt.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Fuck right off, don't put your misunderstanding of my words on me, that's on you. I never implied that trans people should just accept abuse, that's you jumping to false conclusions due to your inabulity to grasp basic consepts. If you want to start arguments with strangers on the internet over your outlandish made up interpretation of what they actually written, don't involve me.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't read all those cunty words you wrote. Try wording it less like a cunt, cunt.

[–] BlovedMadman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, can you let me know what words you didn't understand, I can dumb it down for you.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Why would I read garbage? It's the same bullshit you spew every thread.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago

Why were you downvoted? You’re comment is absolutely salient

[–] abraxas@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you ask every vegan I've ever had a discussion with, that would be every non-vegan in the world.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Personally the only people I dislike for eating meat are the kind who have it in literally every meal in excessive amounts

I also think people should have to kill the animals themselves if they want to eat them rather than be disconnected by buying them in stores to be morally consistent but that's just me

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think if you're going to post things on the internet you should have to build the device you're using to do that yourself. And write all the software needed to do it.

Or maybe it's silly to put arbitrary moral requirements on other people. If you think it's wrong to eat meat, sure whatever. But trying to set some arbitrary goalpost that you know isn't feasible to make it so something you already think is morally wrong to be extra morally wrong because it's hypocritical or whatever is kinda weird.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not sure this is the best example becauss there is a similar issue there of phones being made via basically slavery, I hypocritically say typing on my Samsung phone (though looking into buying a fairphone next which is the best I can possibly do while still having the practical neccesity of a smartphone)

The difference there is though that I would have no moral problem with building the phone and writing the software, physically capable or not. I'm not saying people should need to physically be able to kill the animal all by themselves, just that they should be morally able to, if given a gun pointed at an animal's head, pull the trigger and be ok with that decision

My point is not to be the gatekeeper of what's right and wrong, my point is to force people to make those decisions themselves and to be morally consistent. If people are ok with killing animals then that's fine by me, the bit I don't like is the level of abstraction we have that means people don't have to think about the consequences of their choices too deeply

[–] abraxas@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I actually hate how distanced we are from meat in general, and agree that in general people should have the opportunity to kill their own meat.

That said, here's a real counterpoint. PTSD. I know people with severe PTSD from witnessing some unspeakable brutality like the violent death of a loved one or friend. Nobody should ever ask a PTSD patient to kill an animal themselves. Which is the problem with the whole "have to kill animals" thing entirely. Too many people have some traumatic event.

Honestly, I think that's where a lot of vegans come from. I have an extended family member who snapped after watching one of those vegan documentaries. She was weird before then for reasons none of us really knew, but she starved herself until she was hospitalized for malnutrition and her hair started falling out. When she got out, she wouldn't eat meat anymore and wouldn't talk about it. She isn't a "vegetarian" in any good meaning of the word, constantly struggling with nutritional issues and avoiding meat entirely because she can't bring herself to eat it. It has become a quiet ethical thing to her, but it's more than that.

So IMO, we gotta cure PTSD before making people kill. I DO think we should offer "kill and butcher your own meat" as an elective field trip in school. I got to visit my first farm in middle-school and it really helped give me a balanced view of the world of food. Even if it was just a chicken, if I could've killed my own, cleaned it, and cooked it, it would've really rounded out my head on the topic back then.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think if you're going to get PTSD from killing an animal then you shouldn't eat meat. If the act is so traumatising for someone then clearly they have some kind of conflict about it.

If you already have PTSD fine those people get a pass don't want to cause more harm but that's an incredibly small subset of people

I don't think people who are incapable of killing an animal (mentally not physically) should be allowed to eat said animals

I'm a vegetarian and am perfectly healthy, on the higher side of BMI, regularly go to the gym and have above average muscle mass so the argument that you can't get the nutrients you need is bullshit. I'm sorry about your family member though that sounds like a full blown eating disorder, not veganism

[–] abraxas@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think if you’re going to get PTSD from killing an animal then you shouldn’t eat meat

PTSD is a reaction to trauma, not a measurement for whether something is ethical. I have a MASSIVE problem with that idea. Sounds like this isn't about anything rational, just an excuse to discourage people from eating meat.

And PTSD is often about a situation and not just something in that situation. You can see a dead body without getting PTSD, but if it's your best friend hanging from a rafter, a little different. Ditto with animals. I know at least one person (alluded above or elsewhere) who got PTSD by being very impressionable and young and watching very specific documentaries about animals dying on a day she was also sick. I'm sure I could come up with an animal-kill scenario that would give most who experienced it PTSD. That doesn't mean you shouldn't eat meat if you can. There's almost certainly people out there who has gotten PTSD that relates or triggers by something plant-based.

And how exactly can you confirm which people do or do not already have PTSD? It's one of the most underreported disorders, and in certain circles (including those with a high rate of severe PTSD) stigmatized.

I don’t think people who are incapable of killing an animal (mentally not physically) should be allowed to eat said animals

Do you agree this extends to plants? I am incapable of growing plants because I have a common HFA symptom (despite not having HFA) that things like dirt and paint drive me into a panic. My wife does all the gardening in my family because I can't grow a tomato. By your logic, I should ONLY eat meat (as I do not have a problem killing an animal, though I'm not sure whether or not I could butcher one based on the same reasons I can't grow vegetables).

I’m a vegetarian and am perfectly healthy, on the higher side of BMI, regularly go to the gym and have above average muscle mass so the argument that you can’t get the nutrients you need is bullshit

I really wish you'd leave the reddit 'tude at the door. I'm trying to treat you like you're an intelligent person, but your reply to me pointing out that some vegetarians/vegans have irreperable nutrition issues is that it's bullshit. Is it your opinion taht anyone who even lazily tries a non-meat diet is automatically 100% healthy? Is it your opinion that you can prove ALL humans can be healthy on a vegan diet, even those who have intolerances to common staples of said diet?

Also, more directly, is it your opinion that every person with a high BMI that goes to the gym and has muscle mass is automatically healthy? That seems like a severe underrepresentation of health. There are real long-term risks of hair loss, weak bones, muscle wasting, skin rashes, hypothyroidism, and anemia in vegan diets as well as an elevated risk of severe strokes. Ask any honest nutritionist and the claim that we actually know enough about nutrition to zero out those risks is nonsense. Claims that veganism is 100% healthy is similar to claims that vaping is 100% safe. In both, there is an unspoken "if done right" AND an unspoken "we think, and except a few studies we don't personally accept yet".