this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
465 points (91.9% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35509 readers
792 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago (5 children)

just 2 people

What does this mean?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 121 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If every church houses two homeless people, no more homeless people.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Assuming the distribution is the same for both

[–] huginn@feddit.it 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

(it's not)

But the point is not invalid. It's a problem that seems insurmountable but can definitely be tackled.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Although homeless people absolutely can and do migrate. They prefer cities for somewhat similar reasons to everyone else, and with no place they are allowed to live why not squat somewhere with lots of (begging/stealing/dumpsterdiving) opportunities and shorter walks?

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Maybe OP believes every town in the US has exactly 1 church and 2 homeless people and is mildly infuriated that the church doesn't allow the 2 homeless people to live there?

[–] lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 7 months ago

I think OP believes every town in the US has twice as many homeless people as churches, it doesnt need to be exactly 1 church and 2 homeless people.

But either way, that's probably not true. Since homeless people tend to be in larger cities.

But then again, lots of people become homless in the suburbs and then move to the city to get the social services. If churches in the suburbs housed a few people as they become homeless, it would probably help. It's better to keep people in their communities so they have a better chance of returning to housefullness.

But probably not that much, since homelessness rates are strongly correlated with housing prices, so expensive cities create more homelessness than cheap suburbs.

[–] RHOPKINS13@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you'd think OP is saying 1 church per town. Just that there are ~380k churches in the United States, and less than twice as many homeless people.

I agree, far too many people are left out in the cold at night when we have many public, climate-controlled buildings with working bathrooms and possibly even showers that are empty after a certain hour. If the homeless were able to regularly get a good night's sleep and a shower in, they might be more able to hold down jobs and become contributing members of society again.

Schools certainly would be great as a shelter after hours, most have gyms with showers, possibly laundry machines, and certainly ample space for someone to sleep with a sleeping bag. If we could just figure out a way to make sure everything stays clean for students to use the next day, no left-behind drugs, no vandalism, etc. that could be a wonderful solution.

My guess is that in most places the homeless population would easily fit within the gymnasium alone.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're implying that there are two homeless people for every church and that every church should house two homeless people to solve homelessness. Not agreeing with OP, just trying to answer your question.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

and that every church should house two homeless people

Not even directly house. Even helping support those 2 people would go a long way toward demonstrating that churches actually do some good.

[–] dlpkl@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There's only two more homeless people than churches in the United States. If we make every homeless person into a church, we can also have more churches.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m also confused by what the image itself is trying to say

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you take 2 of every homeless person in the US into one of every church in the US, there would be no more homeless people in the US.