this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
824 points (98.5% liked)

science

14678 readers
89 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

48 seconds. I predict a glut of helium. balloons for everyone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Actually using that heat is the next challenge, I suppose. If I am not mistaken (and I am often mistaken), they are not actually using the reaction to power the reactor yet.

It's all math, basically. If they measure more energy coming out than they put in, it's considered a win.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How would they use it to power a reactor? Is it like a regular nuclear reactor where you essentially boil water to power a steam turbine?

I swear a part of my inner child died the day I found out that nuclear reactors are essentially big kettles.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It's likely going to create steam, just like a reactor today. It is a very effective way to turn a turbine for a generator, after all. All the bits that actually start and maintain the reaction need fuck tons of electricity, so the reaction can literally power itself when attached to a generator.

While there are a ton of formulas for converting energy from heat, to steam, to mechanical energy and then into electricity, it's all basically the same: more power out than you put in is a good reaction.

Almost forgot, water is dual function. It cools the equipment and it acts as an energy transport. I believe ammonia is more efficient in some circumstances, but water is better for obvious reasons.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I mean it makes sense. My inner child wants there to be some sort of magic that splits the atomic nucleus (or in the case of fusion... well you know) and harnesses the energy through some sort of fancy magical-to-us-commonfolk process.

Kettles are great, but not whimsical or fantastic.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How the heat is generated is still wicked-cool and is basically magic. Think about it this way: We are holding a toroid shaped micro-sun in place with magnets. Those magnets need to be adjusted hundreds of times a second to keep everything in its place. Sure, it just boils water, but how it boils water is where the real magic is.

We are building atoms by taking control of the core of a star.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's fair! I'm not trying to downplay the accomplishment at all. In that way even nuclear fission is really cool.

It was just a big dissilusionment moment for me way back when I learned how the electricity is actually generated.