this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
874 points (96.2% liked)

Atheist Memes

5578 readers
7 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KRAW@linux.community 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The entire (well most) Old Testament is the Jews constantly screwing up and doing terrible things while God continually face palms and fixes their mess. The whole reason Jesus is even on Earth is because there wasn't a single soul who could've been a model human being otherwise.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems derived and also ignores the Patriarchs and Matriarchs of the first five books. Also the whole thing about Jesus living a perfect life is only found in one part of John right?

[–] KRAW@linux.community 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not really. All of them are portrayed as doing things that Jewish culture would view unfavorably or immoral. God isn't exactly giving a stamp of approval to each action of these figures. Pretty much any time they do anything good it is because God enabled them to do it either through miraculous acts or by instructing them.

Also Jesus is considered the son of God throughout the entire New Testament. Maybe the word "perfect" isn't used, but he is portrayed as a model human being throughout. Otherwise his sacrifice wouldn't be able to serve it's purpose.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All of them are portrayed as doing things that Jewish culture would view unfavorably or immoral. God isn’t exactly giving a stamp of approval to each action of these figures. Pretty much any time they do anything good it is because God enabled them to do it either through miraculous acts or by instructing them.

Examples?

Also Jesus is considered the son of God throughout the entire New Testament.

Except in Mark and the Q source.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Examples?

Abraham, the OG benificiary of the covenant with God, lies about his wife twice. Moses kills an Egyptian. These are all things that the Commandments explicitly mark as immoral behaviors. Obviously the success the figures experienced also had nothing to do with their own ability, e.g. Moses did not part the Red Seas by himself.

Except in Mark and the Q source.

The first verse of Mark calls him the Son of God. The Q source is also a purely hypothetical book, so while it technically doesn't say Jesus is the Son of God, it also doesn't say anything at all until it is actually found.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first verse of Mark calls him the Son of God.

In some versions. Not all. Additionally there are lines where it is clear that Joseph is the daddy.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%202%3A41-52&version=GW

Is Joseph the daddy or not? I recommend the book Misquoting Jesus. He does a pretty decent job showing that the Bible editors tried to shift references to Joseph being the biological parents to being the stepfather. Which indicates strongly that the Q document didn't have that idea. It was an invention by the author of Matthew that the author of Luke and Acts liked.

[–] KRAW@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Odd. Alright Luke 2:41-52. Watch how Mary talks about Joseph as his father.

As I said very likely Q had the story without the son of god being a literal son (Aramaic the same word for son is follower) and Roman legends of children of gods were pressed into place.

The Bible is a very very human book. It contradicts itself and earlier versions of itself because people argue.