Technology

59116 readers

2828 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

389

The Incognito Mode Myth Has Fully Unraveled (www.wired.com)

submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

You do know they updated it soon after this became a major thing, right?

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That linked picture is at least from 2017 from a quick research. What they clarify now in the latest update is that Google is not exempt from tracking your activity.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know that actually. I recall similar wording going back to when Incognito tabs were launched.

Got a source on that?

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Google quietly updates Chrome’s incognito warning in wake of tracking lawsuit

[...]

Here’s the updated text (emphasis added):

“Others who use this device won’t see your activity, so you can browse more privately. This won’t change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google. Downloads, bookmarks and reading list items will be saved.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/16/24039883/google-incognito-mode-tracking-lawsuit-notice-change

The text in that article is different from your screenshot, I don't know what's up with that. Perhaps it's regional.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago

I believe the one I posted is older, based on the logo.

So looks like they've updated multiple times, each more reader-friendly than the last...

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They might have changed the wording, but it's been insanely clear for many years, and it never at any point implied it changed anything about what websites did.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You and I may have known, but

it's been insanely clear for many years

If it had been clear it wouldn't have become an issue.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

It isn't an issue. The exact wording might have changed, but the content has been identical for years and years. It included "sites and others who can see your traffic can do whatever the hell they want" the whole time, in entirely unambiguous idiot proof language.

This is an imaginary horseshit lawsuit. It was not possible to read the very obvious text and be misled about what incognito mode did or didn't do at any point, and it was automatically displayed in every tab. There was never at any point any possible room for confusion.