this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
30 points (84.1% liked)

Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

430 readers
4 users here now

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Please keep it civil.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RoundSparrow@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That the human brain hardware has not evolved in the past 2000 years, and classical religions are by far not the only means to induce entire populations (spanning multiple nations and continents) into believing false things. Modern advertising symbolism is often the new religion that motivates the mind, and people do not demonstrate nearly enough self-awareness of the side-effects of peer pressure induced by modern marketing/advertising. We are in an increasing race to the bottom of the flaws of the human brain that was never prepared for recording and unlimited playback of images, sounds, motion video, etc. All of humanity is under threat, and Carl Sagan's 1995 book calls this out, among others, such as Neil Postman's 1985 book Amusing Ourselves to Death. Trickle Down Economics may be a bullshit deception, but Trickle Down Memes and Symbols are very real, and we are entering another Dark Ages, this time planet-wide.

“Finnegans Wake is the greatest guidebook to media study ever fashioned by man.” - Marshall McLuhan, Newsweek Magazine, page 56, February 28, 1966.

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean Carl Sagan's masterwork a demon haunted world? I picked that up again earlier this year and had a good laugh at how correct he was. It did keep pointing out that engagement/understanding is needed with the other sides. 10/10 would recommend it before cosmos or pale blue dot. He does such a good job trying to communicate his points in a nice and compassionate way. Sadly when I recommend it people assume it's the atheist manifesto or something?

[–] RoundSparrow@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You mean Carl Sagan’s masterwork a demon haunted world?

yep.

It did keep pointing out that engagement/understanding is needed with the other sides.

"The chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is in its polarization: Us vs. Them — the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you’re sensible, you’ll listen to us; and if not, you’re beyond redemption. This is unconstructive… Whereas, a compassionate approach that from the beginning acknowledges the human roots of pseudoscience and superstition might be much more widely accepted. If we understand this, then of course we feel the uncertainty and pain of the abductees, or those who dare not leave home without consulting their horoscopes, or those who pin their hopes on crystals from Atlantis." - Sagan

Everyone is mocking an out-group or the other since 2014, it's reached saturation.... inescapable. Echo chamber thinking has become routine, exactly opposite of Pale Blue Dot thinking.

[–] Shit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Have you read Nausea by Sartre? I think you might enjoy it.

"People. You must love people. Men are admirable. I want to vomit—and suddenly, there it is: the Nausea"