this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
966 points (98.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
812 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev
966
Review Please (programming.dev)
submitted 7 months ago by JPDev@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
112 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're just googling it rather than actually speaking from experience.

Like I said, I've used pre-commit for multiple years now. If you can run your lints from a command line, you can configure pre-commit to run them.

The project I'm working on has multiple sub-projects and those each have their own venvs, pyproject.tomls, etc.

Monorepos definitely make things a bit trickier, but again, you absolutely can write a local pre-commit hook that runs a bash command or script that 1.) activates the necessary venv and 2.) runs the lint command. I know this because I've done it, multiple times.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

If you can run your lints from a command line, you can configure pre-commit to run them.

Yes but the whole point of pre-commit is it takes care of installing the lints. For most supported languages this requires the lint to be in its own repo. That is very annoying for project-specific lints that you would ideally want to just put in a subdirectory. Does that make sense?

can write a local pre-commit hook that runs a bash command or script that 1.) activates the necessary venv and 2.) runs the lint command. I know this because I’ve done it, multiple times.

Yeah there's not really any point using pre-commit at that point.