374
submitted 6 months ago by juicy@lemmy.today to c/politics@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- After narrowly backing Israel’s military action in Gaza in November, Americans now oppose the campaign by a solid margin. Fifty-five percent currently disapprove of Israel’s actions, while 36% approve.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago

I'm mocking lemmy's pro-genocide centrists who immediately call anyone who opposes Netanyahu's genocide a Russian shill, yes.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Most of the people I've seen here are against Israel, even the ones who are against Russia.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Good for you. The centrists who love that the US is supporting the genocide they've always wanted scream "Russian" when anyone suggests that the US should stop supporting genocide.

If you've never seen it, try being critical of the US' support for Netanyahu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They're against Israel but when you say you'll vote third party or sit out the vote you get people jumping at your throat and trying to deny reality by telling you to fall in like or we'll get another Trump term. I don't see it as much now but it was pretty common even just a couple of weeks ago.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

They're against Israel but when you say you'll vote third party or sit out the vote

No. They assume without evidence that opposition to genocide is advocacy for voting third party or staying home or voting for Trump.

I see it constantly in this community.

"Biden should stop supporting Netanyahu's genocide."

"You think Trump would be better? Russian Chinese Republican nazi tankie child shill bot!!!"

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean, strategy in FPTP voting systems means that you aren't voting for a candidate, but against the worst candidate. Is this not the correct understanding? Or does your state have RCV or another alternate voting system?

Edit: I was downvoted, so maybe I misunderstood something. Could someone explain?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The people who decided not to vote for Biden made that decision with this information in mind. The problem is: The enshittification of the Democratic Party relies on the idea that people will hold their noses and vote for the "lesser evil". This nonsense is how we got Trump in 2016 and how we (or well you I'm not American) are going to get him in 2024. Even if everyone does hold their noses and vote for Trump we'll get another Trump, then another, then another, until the Dems are putting children back in the mines and saying "but we're better than the Republicans".

If people don't put their foot down and demand change nothing will happen.

Is this not the correct understanding?

It is in very general terms, but when you get down to it it fails miserably, because when both candidates are bad people not all vote for the lesser evil; they just don't vote. This depresses turnout for the Democrats (Republicans love Trump), when voter turnout is their lifeline. The people who voted for Biden in 2016 are extremely disillusioned with him for many reasons, not the least of which actively perpetuating genocide. This isn't the recipe for high voter turnout. Essentially saying vote for the lesser evil works until the people you're calling on say no thanks, and we're way past that point.

Edit: Grammar.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh shit I brainfarted, I meant 2020.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

FPTP implies you're voting against all the other candidates, not just against the worst candidate. I don't think that's worthy of downvotes though lmao I think state propagandists tend to downvote discussion that actually leads anywhere productive. Sorry.

load more comments (65 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
374 points (96.3% liked)

politics

18931 readers
3245 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS