this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
611 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

33546 readers
340 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vacuumoftalent@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Looks ugly until you need to implement something and realize you've been blessed with a description of business logic.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 17 points 11 months ago

Strong names are great, but (sometimes) mentioning the type of variable in the name is redundant.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Until they find out that the way to descriptive variables or functions needs to be extended with new business logic requiring renaming of functions again and again.

I think maintaining code with this level of verbose naming, will be a pain over time. If they don't let the naming slip, and then they could as well use cryptic 3 letter names.