this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)

196

16509 readers
2871 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
158
paruledox (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] garyyo@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think you have it backwards, the paradox of tolerance is the idea that we must be intolerant towards the intolerant, rather than showing tolerance freely to even those that wish us harm. It is seemingly a paradox because it says that to spread tolerance we have to actually be intolerant towards a specific group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.one 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The person who made this is either a troll or a fascist, and to me it doesn't really matter which. Poisoning the meanings of words and theories is an old, old fascist trick and that's all that's happening here.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

You can acknowledge that it’s a paradox then shrug your shoulders and tell them, “I guess I’m a hypocrite too. Fuck Nazis.”

That’s what I do.

🤷🏻‍♂️ Fuck Nazis.

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you should read the article linked in the post, i hope you can reconsider this accusation :)

[Tolerance] is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 12 points 1 year ago

I think he's referring to the conflating of tolerance with acceptance of intolerance that is implied by the image text

Although according to someone else's comment, it actually is even darker than that.

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that "paradox" boils down to the intolerant saw of "you're not tolerant if you're not tolerant of intolerance"

It's a paradox b/c it's not really a paradox, but it seems like one, when couched disingenuously.

But it's like freedom. Can you really believe in freedom if you believe in law and punishment?* But can you truly be free with criminals running amok? So to have freedom, you must restrict freedom of those who would take away your freedom.

* I'm well aware lots of ppl say "no" here

[–] ItsEveNow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A paradox is a seemingly contradictory statement which is actually not a contradiction if you look closely. That's why it's named like this. Being intolerant towards fascists and other intolerant groups is actually a way to promote tolerance, it's a tolerant act.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It's not a tolerant act, but the result is that the base level of tolerance is higher, so it's an acceptable compromise.