this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
45 points (92.5% liked)

Linux

48178 readers
1363 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why do they use Shell?

Sorry for bad English. English isn't my native languange

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think in *nix, shell-configured init systems came first and the non-shell config file init systems are a more recent development. The real question is why the non-shell-configured init systems decided to change it up.

[–] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm far from an expert in init systems, but there are some benefits to declarative approaches for configuration. It's one of the main reasons yaml and toml are as popular as they are. The short version is, declarative configuration tends to be less verbose, and the declarative contract defines what state you want things to be in, not how to get there which makes it easier on the person writing the unit file, and on the implementers of systemd in that there's a smaller surface-area to test

Generally declarative:

  • requires less verbose configuration files, less room for error
  • is easier to document and easier to understand
  • leaves the implementers more freedom to improve their system as long as they live up to the agreed-upon contract
  • is easier for implementers to test/validate. They don't need to support a scripting language and every single crazy thing someone might try with one but still consider valid
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

The declarative approach also allows for better composability - user tweaks can just be the relevant lines on top of the packaged default config.