this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
639 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12570 readers
741 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dwalin@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No third world war yet. So i assume yes.

[–] doors_3@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is an incredibly low bar to judge any organization. There are multiple conflicts going around the world that UN has done nothing to do. When it comes to permanent members of the Security council, the UN is powerless. Heck, it is powerless if one of the permanent members decides to flex it's muscles somewhere else geographically either.

Also, no world war is also largely due to presence of nukes with nations. The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction prevents nations from going into full blown wars when 2 nuclear powers are involved.

[–] dwalin@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

The UN has the power the nations want to give it. And for now, its this. Dont complain about the UN, complain about our governments