this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)
Autism
6867 readers
7 users here now
A community for respectful discussion and memes related to autism acceptance. All neurotypes are welcome.
We have created our own instance! Visit Autism Place the following community for more info.
Community:
Values
- Acceptance
- Openness
- Understanding
- Equality
- Reciprocity
- Mutuality
- Love
Rules
- No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments e.g: racism, sexism, religious hatred, homophobia, gatekeeping, trolling.
- Posts must be related to autism, off-topic discussions happen in the matrix chat.
- Your posts must include a text body. It doesn't have to be long, it just needs to be descriptive.
- Do not request donations.
- Be respectful in discussions.
- Do not post misinformation.
- Mark NSFW content accordingly.
- Do not promote Autism Speaks.
- General Lemmy World rules.
Encouraged
- Open acceptance of all autism levels as a respectable neurotype.
- Funny memes.
- Respectful venting.
- Describe posts of pictures/memes using text in the body for our visually impaired users.
- Welcoming and accepting attitudes.
- Questions regarding autism.
- Questions on confusing situations.
- Seeking and sharing support.
- Engagement in our community's values.
- Expressing a difference of opinion without directly insulting another user.
- Please report questionable posts and let the mods deal with it. Chat Room
- We have a chat room! Want to engage in dialogue? Come join us at the community's Matrix Chat.
.
Helpful Resources
- Are you seeking education, support groups, and more? Take a look at our list of helpful resources.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The book "Collaborative Intelligence" is on the 3 most-common of the 4 innate-mind-languages we think in.
It totally ignores the 4th.
which, from what I've read, is possibly more than 50% of the physicists people.
I think in abstract-shapes, which means that instead of seeing the appearances of something, I need to see how it works, before I can then abstract-out its thoughtshape, which is what my mind holds onto.
I've no internal-visual, which is falsely-labeled "aphantasia" ( no-imagination ) by psychology.
I've plenty of imagination, but it works within the mind-function that I have, not in some mind-function I don't have.
This difference allows me to "see through" appearances to more fundamental/underlying reality, much more easily than more-conventional minds do.
As Temple Grandin's TED talk on kinds of minds pointed-out, however, I'm mindblind to many things that the more-common mind-functions catch:
She wouldn't have put the emergency-generators at Fukushima at the bottom of a pit, beside a tsunami-infested sea, because she would have seen them flood ( she thinks in movies ).
I wouldn't ever have noticed any potential problem, because I'd have been "looking at" the function withing each generator, & feeling the beneficial-protection of having them not easily attackable, or something.
You NEED to have all-4 innate-mind-languages working on any product/service that you're going to release, as each has its own mind-blindnesses.
Don't leave any 1 of 'em out!
But being of the least-common ( & ignored by much/all of the psychology profession/industry ), is a kind of superpower, when their prejudice isn't grinding on one's validity, fersure.
: P
It means you don't have mental imagery. People with aphantasia can still have an imagination.
that's super interesting! thanks for sharing. now, I'm think about reading that book. maybe my library will have it.