this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
70 points (90.7% liked)

World News

32326 readers
491 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

  • Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance
  • However, others say comparisons between speech at World Court and Mao-era rhetoric are overstated, noting Beijing still favours a two-state solution
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Shawamreh said Beijing’s early response to the war in Gaza emphasised non-partisan condemnation of “all violence” – a position Israel criticised as unclear and ambiguous –

Alright then let's be clear FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 0 points 8 months ago

It was unclear and ambiguous because it didn't say explicitly that Israel should have a monopoly on violence. Also anti-semitic, probably.