Not The Onion

12313 readers

221 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

376

Murder defendant slips restraints in court, stabs his lawyer with pen. All good, attorney says (www.latimes.com)

submitted 8 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/defending-guilty-people

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

From your link:

For several reasons, lawyers should defend their clients vigorously regardless of whether or not they believe them to be innocent.

From your previous post:

Many defense attorneys aren't there to get their clients out of trouble

Their job is specifically to get their clients out of trouble.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It's to provide the best defense possible, there's a difference.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

This should not be hard to understand.

The police find that man A kills man B. A is now the defendant in a criminal trial. The job of A's lawyer is to introduce facts that improve the outcome of the trial. Sometimes, that's fighting because there isn't enough evidence available to assert that man A actually killed man B. Other times, it's getting their client to plead guilty because it's the easiest thing to do in a case that they're guaranteed to lose. Other times, it's to get a lesser sentence because B was abusive to A and A couldn't escape. It could be that A was acting in self defense.

Removing all nuance and saying that the one and only goal is to get their clients out of trouble is incorrect. Not every defendant is guilty, and not every criminal needs the maximum punishment.