this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
253 points (94.1% liked)

News

23300 readers
3759 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines was among more than a dozen college athletes who filed a lawsuit against the NCAA on Thursday, accusing it of violating their Title IX rights by allowing transgender woman Lia Thomas to compete at the national championships in 2022.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, details the shock Gaines and other swimmers felt when they learned they would have to share a locker room with Thomas at the championships in Atlanta. It documents a number of races they swam in with Thomas, including the 200-yard final in which Thomas and Gaines tied for fifth but Thomas, not Gaines, was handed the fifth-place trophy.

Thomas swam for Pennsylvania. She competed for the men’s team at Penn before her gender transition.

Thomas was the first openly transgender athlete to win a Division I title in any sport, finishing in front of three Olympic medalists for the championship. By not making the final, the lawsuit mentions that Florida swimmer Tylor Mathieu, who was not a plaintiff, was denied first-team All-American honors in that event.

Other plaintiffs included athletes from volleyball and track.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have no clue how to resolve this

I think the first step needs to be asking why we do this and what we want. We have women's sports because (cis) women generally cannot compete sufficiently with (cis) men. But what are we trying to accomplish? I would say in middle school and high school our goal should be inclusivity. So trans men and women should be able to compete in their identified genders.

On the other hand in college and the Olympics inclusivity is probably not as important for adults competing at some of the highest levels. So I am more willing to accept some limits, but I'm certainly not well versed enough to know where to draw that line.

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's very easy to resolve, most kids that participate in sports are themselves (shockingly) also kids and will not have gained any advantage if allowed to transition early enough. Even a year or two of puberty is going to shed away very quickly.

(And leave us older trans people who are no longer teenagers who might have gone through a full puberty to have that advantage not participate in sports, and leave kids alone to transition and participate in their chosen gender.)

Either way this is a problem that resolves itself if trans people are allowed to accept and be themselves when they figure it out, which would be a lot more possible if people actually took the time to understand us.

Also genetic advantages like Micheal Phelp's lungs and body have always been a part of sports. So if we happen to want to play sports we're still women playing sports with a genetic disadvantage in every way that matters to us like having babies. (sports are the last thing on most of our minds)

Either way stop making trans people the center of your political battles. We just want to live without you fucking up our lives. We aren't anything that matters to the vast majority of instances. We are the rare exception. Go figure out that they'd rather you argue about us than about the actual issues like health care, abortion, union rights, civil rights, etc.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But the thing is, it’s the actual athletes that make up the league that have a problem with this.

You’re only looking at it from your side and not from theirs

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The vast majority of women don't mind. And you don't speak for us or get to decide if women and trans women are on different sides about anything. Because we literally are women.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I agree the vast majority don’t.

These ones do, the problem could be solved easily enough with separate locker rooms.

And I’m not trying to speak for anyone, so watch your fucking self it’s right there in the article.

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But why seperate, why differentiate just to alienate a kid trying to live out their lives?

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

First of all, the person in question was in their 20’s at the time. She is 25 now and it happened 2 years ago.

Secondly, I never said to alienate anyone. Give the women that are uncomfortable their own locker room.

I do not see the issue here.

The only place would not be allowed is that locker room and that does not affect her in any meaningful way.

Yes, she has to deal with the fact that those people are uncomfortable around her, but that is just part of life.

Let’s try this another way, if the way to make the problem go away is just to allow someone else to have another locker room and not share it, why shouldn’t we do that with how easy it is?

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I buy that if it's not a "trans locker" but a "TERF locker". Women that don't have a problem can go to the "normal" women locker.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago

That’s what I keep saying, everyone wants to take it the wrong way.

I even said the people with a problem could just use the men’s locker room.

If that is a problem then they can just go in shifts. There are so many easy ways to let these people isolate themselves if they are uncomfortable or bigoted.

Either way everyone wins.

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because it's insisting on a distinction when there is none. Anatomy doesn't make the woman dude.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You keep looking at this like I have ever said that.

Here are the simple facts: you have one person who makes some of the group uncomfortable changing around them, you give the group that is uncomfortable, their own changing area.

Why they are uncomfortable does not matter at all maybe it could be just because they don’t want to change around a different competitor. I really don’t give a shit. There’s an easy solution.

Would we be having this issue if it was a group that didn’t want to change around certain competitors for any other reason?

Maybe they’re from nationalities that clash next time, the same solution works.

Maybe it’s just redheads that do not want to change around people with blue eyes.

You already have two locker rooms, and room and the women’s room have the ones that are uncomfortable use the men’s room there’s not gonna be anyone in there anyway

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a whole lot of words to use to say just to say use the men's room and the answer is no. We are women we're entitled to be with women. We need the same or more protection from men that other women do.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My suggestion was that the people with the problem can use the men’s locker room since it is already built.

Everyone without a problem can use the women’s.

If the people with a problem are uncomfortable being isolated then oh fucking well.

Either they are truly uncomfortable in which case they can be comfortable now, or they are bigots that are self isolating.

Fucking win win

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Learn to put proper antecedents in if you don't want to be misunderstood.

"These ones do, the problem could be solved easily enough with separate locker rooms."

That could just have been as left vague as you could word it to both insult while maintaining plausible deniability that you didn't intend to insult.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You already have two locker rooms, and room and the women’s room have the ones that are uncomfortable use the men’s room there’s not gonna be anyone in there anyway.

I feel like that is very clear

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It wasn't in the pertinent message when you could be misconstrued. You only clarified your position after you started getting downvotes

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago

Also, I’m on kbin I can’t see Lemmy downvotes so idk what they are at.

Feel free to sign up on a cabin account and check.

We don’t do anonymous down votes here, or up votes for that matter

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 1 points 8 months ago

I didn’t think I was gonna have to defend a fucking dissertation here.

[–] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If tomorrow the separate locker was build then it would be another thing. It's not about seeing a penis (and maybe not even that) but "that is not a woman". And that is the only problem. In their minds a trans woman is not a woman.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There is already another room. The men’s locker room.

How often are men and women competing at the same time, so that might change something.

Maybe just use shifts then?

I don’t care about what the reason is.

The people asking for it are the ones isolating themselves, and honestly I just see that as a good thing.

Our lives would all be way better if bigots isolated themselves.

Edit: better gots to bigots

[–] OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

Letting kids transition before they even reach puberty is a great way to potentially ruin their lives forever. Kids are so impressionable and change faster than the wind. They instantly succumb to peer pressure and 99% of the cases have no clue what they want because they are kids. They don't have a lot of life experience.

I know only one case where I knew that transition would have been normal at any age for him. When we were kids it would have been 100% impossible. Now we are older farts and he still didn't transition, he doesn't want and would have regretted the decision if he would have had the possibility to do it as a kid.

Transition as a kid should be nearly impossible and you should be put through an infinite amount of tests and visits to the doctor. Reach an age where you can be considered an adult, go ahead and schedule an appointment and transition away. Do as you please.