spoiler
Salaries for new roles are stagnating – and in some cases, falling. Some employers may be looking to cut costs, but the lack of wage growth may be a matter of post-pandemic correction.
The mass US layoffs of the past few years are continuing. In 2024 alone, thousands of workers across many sectors, including media and technology, have lost their jobs and are on the hunt for new ones. But some are finding an unwelcome surprise as they scan listings for open roles. A salary bump is all but impossible; in many cases, wages seem lower than their previous pay – even for the same jobs.
They aren't imagining things. A 2023 report on pay trends from ZipRecruiter showed 48% of 2,000 US companies surveyed lowered pay for certain roles.
But, say experts, companies aren't necessarily just seizing a moment in a tight job market to reduce costs. In some cases, stagnant and even lowered salaries are the result of an overdue reset for a pandemic era surge in compensation when companies were scrambling to fill roles during the Great Resignation. The effect of oversupply
The tightening labour market has left US workers with fewer options than just years earlier. Beginning 2020, employers boosted salaries to new heights to attract talent to a deluge of open roles. But amid an uncertain economy, employers have pulled back from new hires and cut jobs.
"There is now less competition to hire workers – and therefore less need to boost wages," says Nick Bunker, US-based director of North American Economic Research at Indeed. "Job postings have dropped quite a bit, while the supply of workers has grown."
At its peak in early 2022, US wage growth for advertised roles climbed to 9.3% year-over-year, according to Indeed data. It has fallen precipitously ever since, as demand for workers has slumped. By January 2024, it had plummeted to 3.6%. The downward trend continues, and it's unclear when it will reach the bottom.
Now, with a decline in open roles, workers have fewer opportunities to get new jobs and secure better compensation. Simply, employees have less leverage to negotiate pay or secure a better starting salary – especially if they're clawing for any type of employment they can get.
In some cases, says Bunker, a company may not outright drop their compensation for new roles, but in the current environment of inflation, money simply won't go as far – the same wage as before may feel like a pay cut to workers. But in other cases, a greater supply of workers against weakened demand may mean a similar position from 2022 is now advertised with a lower salary.
This is most likely to happen in industries that had the greatest competition for workers during the hiring crisis. For example, Indeed data shows US hospitality and retail jobs experienced 11.8% wage growth year-over-year in February 2022 – falling nearly four-fold 3.4% by January 2024. Companies in other sectors, such as tech, which once experienced a high demand for workers, are now also resetting expectations.
"We saw a massive bull run in the market during the pandemic, where there was a big increase in baseline compensation for workers because of talent shortages," says Chris Rice, of Boston-based US executive tech recruiting firm Riviera Partners. "We're still seeing a market reset that's ongoing. An oversupply means compensation has dropped because the demand is no longer there." 'A whiplash effect'
Ultimately, employers who are filling roles after layoffs or hiring freezes are likely to use the newfound leverage they have, says Till von Wachter, professor of economics at University of California, Los Angeles. "They'll tend to orient their new salaries at the going rate, so starting wages may fall in order to equilibrate the market," he says.
The current phenomenon may be felt most acutely in the US because of how its economy rebounded from the first Covid-19 lockdown in 2020. Indeed data shows its peak wage growth dwarfed that of the UK and Europe. "The US economy jumped out the gates in the wake of stimulus packages and mass vaccinations," says Bunker. "So, wage growth has faded rapidly amid less job market churn and switching."
In many ways, what we're seeing is a correction. Wage growth is reverting to pre-pandemic levels of below 3%, says Bunker. "A 9.3% spike in year-over-year wage growth is anomalous in many ways. It came from the initial shock of Covid-19, and an economy heading towards recession suddenly rapidly expanding, then having to suddenly hit the brakes again. It's a whiplash effect."
At current rates, wage growth may return to pre-Covid levels by May 2024, says Bunker. Whether it rises, plateaus or shrinks from there depends on whether hiring picks up. And if inflation continues to rise, workers will increasingly feel the pinch of these new lower or stagnant salaries, he adds.
While inflation has begun to drop in the US and UK, the cost of living has outstripped salary increases for nearly three years, says Bunker. "Real wages today are still below where they would have been presumed to be, pre-pandemic. So, it's a race between inflation and wages."
Bidenomics saves the day. Yes food and rent are more expensive, yes wages are down, but
Genuinely at this point it’s like “You know what maybe Trump was better”
I already thought Trump’s incompetence made him better for the rest of the world, but at this point I’m like “At least under Trump the economy wasn’t this fucked”
I don't think it being fucked is going to change regardless of who is in office. Neither are willing to do the fundamental changes necessary to put a stop to this lol. Trump just gonna look at it and filter it through his own "actually this is good" rhetoric.
There is a the possibility that this shit is a "Capital strike" in that they are arbitrarily raising prices to make Biden incredibly unpopular. But there's so many other factors such as supply chain shocks, climate change affecting ag yields, land use for meat production, drought, water, and fossil fuel prices. That unless some dumbfuck leaks the Illuminati/McKinsey "BreadFixing" Groupchat or the DOJ charges several high ranking officials at multiple conglomerates, nothing will happen until Trump gets in power.
That wasn't spooky enough, you should hold a flashlight under your chin and do spooky ghost noises while saying "trump baaad"
oh shit that wasn't sarcasm was it
It got me for a second too.
Same lol
Unfortunately I'm too busy imagining how fucked we'd be if a second Chicxulub-scale meteor hit the planet and wiped out 90% of all terrestrial life.
What if we voted against the impact
corporate wants you to find the difference between these pictures:
Except people are suffering now
They're suffering now and the best you or any other liberal politician can do is go "
The economy is fine Jack
"And for people who love to talk about Orwell, that's a hell of a lot more 1984 then even that old Limey jag-off imagined
There's currently 750 armed national guardsmen conducting mandatory searches of people's belongings in the NYC subway system. This happened under a D governor, under a D president. If this happened in North Korea or China you'd be losing your fucking shit. As long as it isn't an R in charge though....
Why are so many of you fucking bozos back in here? Nobody in here buys the electoral politics schlock, go back to telling each other fanfiction of how perfect everything would be if libs were in charge forever
Fed and companies don't care still gonna drive down labors wages and power