this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
55 points (84.8% liked)

Traditional Art

4475 readers
265 users here now

From dabblers to masters, obscure to popular and ancient to futuristic, this is an inclusive community dedicated to showcasing all types of art by all kinds of artists, as long as they're made in a traditional medium

'Traditional' here means 'Physical', as in artworks which are NON-DIGITAL in nature.

What's allowed: Acrylic, Pastel, Encaustic, Gouache, Oil and Watercolor Paintings; Ink Illustrations; Manga Panels; Pencil and Charcoal sketches; Collages; Etchings; Lithographs; Wood Prints; Pottery; Ceramics; Metal, Wire and paper sculptures; Tapestry; weaving; Qulting; Wood carvings, Armor Crafting and more.

What's not allowed: Digital art (anything made with Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint, Krita, Blender, GIMP or other art programs) or AI art (anything made with Stable Diffusion, Midjourney or other models)


make sure to check the rules stickied to the top of the community before posting.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YaksDC@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

This is hanging in the National Portrait Gallery and is the official one. I hate it and it looks so much worse in person.

[–] hasnt_seen_goonies@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Obviously you are allowed to like and dislike whatever art you want. But the thing I like about this portrait in person is it looks better the farther away you look at it. When you examine the portrait up close it doesn't look like a real person. For someone who probably wants us all to look at his whole life and not focus at certain parts, I think it's a pretty good portrait.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] YaksDC@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I don't find it to be a good piece of art and not befitting something as lofty as an official presidential portrait.