this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
207 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48209 readers
704 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I'm looking forward to native Wayland support for Wine and KDE's port to Qt 6.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] elderflower@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't care about copyright or authorship, which becomes a huge problem due to content no longer having a real home in IPFS, everybody can pin, cache or share content on IPFS.

Sounds like a feature, not a shortcoming

[–] skarlow181@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It means that using it properly is automatically illegal. I am not seeing how that's a "feature". It renders it completely unusable.

[–] NotThatDave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. Maybe in some places? But not in most. You can break copyright laws with pen and paper, which don't have any protection against it and are perfectly legal

[–] skarlow181@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

With IPFS every single website you look at becomes cached by your node and redistricted by your node, that's the whole point of it. Redistribution is illegal by default, unless explicitly allowed or public domain. The problem is even if it is allowed, say Open Source software, that often comes with conditions such as "you must include the license when you redistribute it". With IPFS even that doesn't work, as each file or even subsections of a file will get redistributed independently, so if the license is in another file than the one you are redistributing, you are in violation of that license. With Bittorrent in contrast you redistributed whole directories at once, so that's fine.

Unless you want to use IPFS exclusively with only 90+ year old works with expired copyright, I just don't see it working. At the moment nobody really cares, since it is small enough, but that can quickly change.

ISPs and sites like Youtube have exceptions that allow them to redistribute illegal stuff, if they remove it when they are notified. No such exception exists for regular users and I'll doubt that we'll ever get one, as with IPFS there is no origin of a piece of content that you can shift the blame to.