this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
724 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59428 readers
3132 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 106 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Every time I read a story about some billionaire getting angry about their private jets being tracked I recall a part of the Kim Stanley Robinson novel Ministry for the Future, a (very) near-future tale about how a few global climate catastrophes wreak such havoc that regular people start taking extreme measures -- for example randomly shooting down passenger aircraft for months, causing the collapse of the air travel industry. I have to imagine that the 1%ers are thinking about that too now.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 8 months ago

I have to imagine that the 1%ers are thinking about that too now.

"If those kids could read, they'd be very upset."

[–] keefshape@lemmy.ca 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That book is a not-so-covert manifesto, I swear.

In the book, I noticed upon re-reading -- it was always the biggest polluters (usually, the richest of the rich) that had unfortunate drone-strikes while flying.

Not the electric planes. No commuter planes. Straight up 1%-er targets.

B admits to it later on in the book, when they hint B might be Mother.

[–] SuperSynthia@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Would you say it’s a good book? I’m always down for a riveting read :)

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 months ago

It was kind of a difficult read for me - things just hit a little too close to home for me, and the resolution was too perfect. I'd still recommend it though - at the end of the day it's still Kim Stanley Robinson, and he is an absolute master of hard social-scifi.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago

Kim Stanley Robinson is likely one of the best sci fi authors alive. You generally can't go wrong with his stuff.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I would say it is an okay book. It's a little too optimistic on the human side which his books all tend to be. It's worth a read though of only to give some idea of possibilities.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"optimistic" just above was talking about how terrorists were shooting planes out of the sky killing people

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Everyone has a different definition of optimism. 🙂

More I meant the final outcome. I don't think the eco terrorism would be as effective or as coordinated. ELF certainly did not end up changing much in a positive way.

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's what I said

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.de 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Read it! Simply skip chapters you don't like. Watch this speech after you finished the book.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

this speech

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago