this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
567 points (100.0% liked)

196

16490 readers
2380 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Reflex at 100 fps still won't compare to 300 fps without Reflex though

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you'd get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won't make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one

[–] fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know, that's exactly what I am talking about

I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then