this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
127 points (97.7% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2631 readers
190 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm under the impression that wet signature means the original signed contract, not a copy or facsimile. Basically this person is saying "Prove that you and I have a contract by producing the actual piece of paper that I signed."

One of the reasons lots of legal documents were originally signed in blue ink was because it would be easy to tell if you were looking at a black and white copy. Obviously this is less relevant recently.

[–] meathorse@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Everytime I see this argument, I have the same thought:

If he demands something he knows doesn't exist, why did he accept the money?

Further, if they accept his fairy tale premise of an ink signature does that mean the SovCit committed fraud to obtain the loan?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

That makes more sense.
These people must really hate modern technology then.