this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
52 points (98.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
373 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] osti@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course it didn't. Nobody wants to use an entire separate launcher for one or two games only. Maybe they were hoping that users would have many games to choose from on battle.net... eventually, so that it would be worth to use, but I don't think that happened.

[โ€“] forgotaboutlaye@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I hope this means we eventually see other Battle.net games come to Steam, even as a showing of good faith. I'd love to see some of the older Blizzard games on Steam.