Programming

17450 readers

148 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Stacks for Simple Static Sites (fd93.me)

submitted 9 months ago by fd93@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hey, just wanted to drop this here. It's a technical follow-up to The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Static Sites which was reasonably popular, and explains the components of a static site's stack.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aarmea@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Hugo was born out of Google so it has all of the same benefits and drawbacks as every Google project (both internal and external):

Lots of capabilities. You name it, it's a feature.
To support all of those capabilites, there's abstractions for everything -- enough to make you go a little insane if you have to go through the code.
Lacking documentation. Nobody gets promoted for writing docs, so if you really need to know how that feature works, you have to go through the code.
May be abandoned at any time (but pull requests/CLs are always welcome).