this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
540 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
4045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 85 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I hope this inspires other gerrymandered states

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 64 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Here I am, sitting in Louisiana where my newly gerrymandered district (4) simultaneously covers a third of the state, surrounds an entire other district, and cuts a relatively blue city clean in half (Lake charles at the bottom).

All so the state can comply with the court order to add another black district while keeping the republican stranglehold.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wow. This is unbelievable 🤦‍♂️

Modern Republicans are a cancer to the founding father’s intent of democracy

[–] gazby@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 9 months ago

The "founding fathers" argument is pretty much pro-republican at this point. Unless you're a property-owning male the founding fathers didn't want you involved in their "democracy" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_rights_in_the_United_States#Background

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

They always were. Their name has changed, but they've always been here.

[–] techt@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How are there two St. Martin parishes within a proverbial block of each other?

Edit: Oh, okay they're the same parish, geographical locality be damned. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Martin_Parish,_Louisiana

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile in Iowa.

That looks so simple. Why don't we all do that?

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The short answer is that it would give more populous states a Democrat advantage. Republicans are well aware that they will completely lose power on a federal level if gerrymandering was outlawed.

So blame your local republican for being undemocratic

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 60 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not happening by choice; it's happening because voters elected a state Supreme Court which forced it

[–] BassaForte@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

You're welcome