this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
874 points (92.3% liked)

Political Memes

5445 readers
3800 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Kind of rude but thanks for the answer.

What years were Poland and France?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

1939-1940.

The period of 1940-1941 saw the monarchists hide on their island, refusing to move troops from their imperial holdings to defend their supposed allies in Yugoslavia, Norway, Denmark, and Greece, except in the form of token expeditionary forces who were completely ineffective.

They, of course, could not actually remove the standing troops from most of their colonial holdings, as it would almost certainly result in a popular revolt, with good cause, as demonstrated by the Bengal Famine of 1943, not to be confused with the similar in purpose and cause Bengal Famine of 1770.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But the capitalists were already involved in the war at that point?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The ones with a hereditary ruling class and an openly genocidal empire did indeed lose every land battle during this time while struggling to defeat a 3rd rate navy in the Mediterranean.

If you want to call that "killing fascists," knock yourself out, just don't ask yourself what you would call the British Empire if it existed today.

We'll also, for the sake of your argument, completely ignore the Second Sino Japanese War that had been going on since 1937.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t Nazi Germany start off helping the Chinese before they switch sides and fought with the Japanese in that war?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's very complicated. Germany wanted a three way alliance between Germany, China, and Japan, starting with all parties joining the Anti-Comintern Pact, but Chiang Kai-Shek refused to join a pact with Japan while they held Chinese territory from the First Sino Japanese War.

The Nazis tried to modernize the KMT forces so they could chase Mao's tattered and at the time thoroughly spanked army into their mountain hideouts, but the KMT was, quite frankly, a clusterfuck of corrupt nepotism hires so it didn't really work out.

The KMT losing Nanjing pretty much immediately following the outbreak of war firmly ended any further cooperation, as Germany's goal was gaining access to resources and it seemed like Japan would get them all in short order anyways.

However, Chiang Kai-Shek and Mao, and most of their allied warlords, set aside their differences to try and repel the Japanese invasion, and rolled most of their armies into the NRA, which funnily enough was originally organized with Soviet aid in the 1920s to help defeat the leftover Qing warlords, and were able to stall out the Japanese in the interior.

It was still an absolute clusterfuck, and China in total lost over 22 million citizens to combat, famine, and outright genocide from the IJA, while inflicting 2.5+ million Japanese casualties (the majority of the losses Japan suffered in WW2 btw), but at least initially the KMT and Communist forces cooperated, with the KMT receiving aid from America and the Maoists receiving aid from the Soviets.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Man that’s a lot of words to say ‘yes the Chinese were backed by capitalists.’

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, backed by capitalists and socialists, against capitalists.

From 1937-1945.

With the rampant corruption and incompetence from the KMT causing them to lose soldiers at a 5 to 1 ratio against the Japanese, in home territory, despite having a somewhat modern army three times the size of Japan's.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When has it killed fascists without being backed by capitalism?

This was my point in case you forgot.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 9 months ago

1: The various leftist resistance groups in occupied territories

2: The Catalonian anarchists and Spanish Republic after the liberals abandoned it.

3: The Maoists after the alliance with the KMT broke down

Since you "forgot."

And that's just the WW2 era. Afterwards, there was nearly a century of rat fucking "liberals" supporting fascists in South America, Vietnam, and Korea, while socialists fought them.

But, hey at least one of those kind of worked out, right?