this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
441 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The FCC rules will force ISPs to accurately describe fees in labels given to customers, but Comcast said it wants the FCC to rescind a requirement related to "fees that ISPs may, but are not obligated to, pass through to customers." These include state Universal Service fees and other local fees.

As Comcast makes clear, it isn't required to pass these costs on to customers in the form of separate fees. Comcast could stop charging the fees and raise its advertised prices by the corresponding amount to more accurately convey its actual prices to customers. Instead, Comcast wants the FCC to change the rule so that it can continue charging the fees without itemizing them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Doesn't matter what their brand of the month is, Comcast is awful. Yeah their service is the fastest (on paper) in my neighborhood, but after the F-tier experience I had with them for several years, I settled for slower service with a different company that's been more consistent and cheaper (and still somehow manages to have faster upload speeds than even Comcast's 1Gbps plan). Bunch of whiny piss babies, they absolutely should be forced to comply with this rule and reveal precisely how they screw their customer base.