this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
924 points (100.0% liked)
196
16490 readers
2778 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Corporate greedflation.
I was gonna say, this post seems pretty disingenuous to blame "every public figurehead" for corporate greed. Maybe if we better taxed and regulated those companies this wouldn't be happening. If only some public figureheads had literally that exact platform.
Considering greedy corporations are lobbying (bribing) public figure heads, it’s not far off.
Then the party of campaign and political finance reform would be the obvious choice.
lol oh is it? Which party is that again?
I don't know what country you even live in, mate. If it's the USA then look up "HR 1 For The People Act".
Ok and? This act has nothing to do with financial reform.
If you think this changes anything then I have a bridge to sell you.
It literally does, though?
It was a partisan DNC bill that immediately passed the house upon them gaining a majority.
And how exactly is this reforming finance? I’ve read the entire thing and don’t see a single thing that will change the current financial system in any meaningful way
Sounds like a strawman argument to me. This was passed years ago yet nothing has actually changed. It’s meaningless. If you can show me empirical evidence that demonstrates real reform then show me, otherwise your words are as meaningless as this “act”.
You have no argument.
I'm sorry for calling you an idiot, earlier. If you're interested in the subject then I'll leave a brief intro to the US political process.
It's a bit convoluted but basically for a bill to become law it has to pass 3 chambers: the House, the Senate, and be signed by the sitting President. Even after this, the courts can rule changing the interpretation of the law but generally that doesn't happen often because Congress can impeach a judge for misconduct, and judicial organizations can disbar them, effectively ending their legal career.
Amendments to the constitution, anything that changes the congressional budget past a defined limit, removal from office a federal official, or vetoing a decision by a sitting president all require a Supermajority (sometimes referred to as a 2/3rds vote) which is 67 out of 100 senators or 290 of 435 house representatives. One tactic people use to prevent a bill from passing is to simply "filibuster" or prolong the debate process by taking a stand at the podium for long periods of time until people leave to sleep, eat, or return to their families causing them to miss the vote, but a 2/3rds majority can also bypass the filibuster and force the vote to proceed.
HR1 For the People Act was passed in the House of Representatives after the "Blue Wave" backlash against conservatives in 2020 where a lot of new DNC representatives were elected to the House. Unfortunately it was short lived as the Senate has been in a deadlock ever since, even now it's a 48:49 DNC to RNC split with 3 Independents caucusing with DNC to have them elect the majority leader. A total of 45 DNC Senators sponsored the bill but it's not nearly enough to bypass filibuster or even pass at all without support from other parties.
Thanks for proving my point. ROFL.
Way to go slugger.
Your point was that a thing which you claim passed did not in fact pass? And I proved that? Clearly I'm arguing with an addict of some sort, hope you get that sorted out.
Nope. My point is that regardless of who is in office there is no financial reform. It’s the same bullshit regardless of which party is in office.
The fact that it wasn’t passed just echos my point. No one in power is interested in real reform. It’s rich vs poor and congress is on the rich side.
It’s clear you’re too daft to understand that.
Let's be real, the $13 trillion printed in the blink of an eye doesn't help.
Would help a lot more if we had equitable distribution of wealth
We're all equal in death
2023 = "$166.6 billion to $190.5 billion" citation: https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/2023_currency_print_order_revised.htm#:~:text=The%20revised%20print%20order%20increases,%24166.6%20billion%20to%20%24190.5%20billion.
You think that's when this started? For the love of God.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1SL
Wow, you can't even understand a basic graph and what it covers. News flash, it's NOT just printed currency.
"Printing" money is used as a colloquial umbrella term to cover all expansive monetary policy, but I have a feeling you already knew that captain pedantic